Text Version
Entrez PubMed Overview Help | FAQ Tutorial New/Noteworthy E-Utilities
PubMed Services Journals Database MeSH Database Single Citation Matcher Batch Citation Matcher Clinical Queries LinkOut Cubby
Related Resources Order Documents NLM
Gateway TOXNET Consumer
Health Clinical Alerts ClinicalTrials.gov PubMed
Central
Privacy Policy
|
|
-
An intergroup phase III randomized
study of doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and
mesna in advanced soft tissue and bone
sarcomas.
Antman K, Crowley J, Balcerzak SP, Rivkin
SE, Weiss GR, Elias A, Natale RB, Cooper RM, Barlogie B, Trump DL, et
al.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
PURPOSE
AND METHODS: Doxorubicin alone or with dacarbazine (DTIC; AD) is
considered the best available therapy for metastatic adult sarcomas.
Ifosfamide is active in sarcomas that have failed to respond to a
doxorubicin-based regimen. This study was designed to determine if
ifosfamide added to doxorubicin and DTIC (ADI) significantly effects
toxicity, response rate, and survival. Patients with measurable
metastatic or unresectable sarcoma were randomized to receive AD or ADI.
Patients with chondrosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and other sarcomas of bone
were eligible, although those with osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma,
Ewing's sarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and mesothelioma were excluded, as
were patients with prior chemotherapy for sarcoma or prior doxorubicin.
RESULTS: Between 1987 and 1989, 340 eligible patients were randomized.
Significantly more myelosuppression, a higher response rate (17% v 32%;
P < .002) and longer time to progression (4 v 6 months; P < .02)
were observed for patients who received ifosfamide. An overall survival
advantage for the two-drug regimen (12 v 13 months; P = .04) was not
significant by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In all three
randomized trials of doxorubicin with and without ifosfamide (Eastern
Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG], European Organization for Research
and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC], and this study), the response rate was
higher for the ifosfamide-containing arm, significantly so in this and
the ECOG studies. An improved response rate may be particularly
important for the preoperative management of high-grade, borderline
resectable lesions or pulmonary metastases, particularly in younger
patients. In older patients, or for low-to intermediate-grade lesions,
doxorubicin and DTIC followed by ifosfamide on progression is
preferred.
Publication Types:
- Clinical Trial
- Clinical Trial, Phase III
- Multicenter Study
- Randomized Controlled Trial
PMID: 8315425 [PubMed -
indexed for MEDLINE]
|